Attachment Parenting Blog: Raising Children with Love

Run by an attachment parenting dad with three kids, this site is your best place to learn more about attachment parenting, keep up-to-date on parenting news, and much more.

Do you publish photographs of your children online?

Look around you at the different photographs that make up the distinctive design of my blog (if you're reading the RSS feed, just this once click on this link -- The Attachment Parenting Blog -- so you can see what I'm talking about). Maybe it seems a bit odd for me to write about whether or not to publish pictures of your children online when I have a Web site design that's built around photos of my own children.

But look again.

What do you notice? If you said "I can't see any faces, other than yours", you're right. That was a primary design goal when my graphics guy and I spent weeks and weeks working on what you see.

Lots of other parents, both mommy and daddy bloggers, seem to have a far more laissez faire approach, not just including pictures of their children on their sites, but often having lovely close-ups that would make it trivial for a reader to pick out the child from a crowd.

Which leads me to the question: is this a good idea, or am I paranoid?

I dunno, maybe I'm just behind the times and privacy really is dead (as Bill Joy said) and I should just take a proverbial chill pill.

I mean, go to Google Images and search for family (pictures | portraits | picture) and you'll find that it finds 242,000,000 matching images in its database.

242 million pictures.

And yet, it's just a matter of a few seconds to dig up close-up pictures of children, full family portraits, and even baby pics. Click on one of those images and you usually end up on the writer or photographer's Web site which all too frequently has personally identifying information.

I was going to demonstrate how easy it was to go from a picture of a cute kid to figuring out what town they lived in and, in many cases, what school they attend, but then I got a bit freaked and decided it was probably a bad idea.

My take is that the vast majority of people online are nice human beings who enjoy learning more about other people's families. For them, I don't mind sharing a picture or two of my children. But they're not who worries me. What I'm concerned about is the tiny subset, the 0.01% of Internet users, who aren't so benign and are just trouble.

Even if it'd only be one person who came across this blog every two years, that's one person too many, it's someone who I don't want seeing pictures of my kids, even though I am giving up a lot of privacy by blogging about parenting and my family.

Am I paranoid? Many Mommy bloggers and Daddy bloggers seem to disagree with my concerns entirely, sharing daily photographic updates of their children along with highly detailed summaries of their day's activities.

I still can't help worrying, though. My kids are more precious than the richest jewels and I'd never want to put them at risk, but I do try to balance that against my desire to share my experiences as a parent here on this weblog. And so, my compromise is that I do not post photos of my children such that they're recognizable, and I don't use their full names, just first initials (like K-).

Let me ask you, reader: do you blog or otherwise write online? If so, do you write about your children using their full names? Do you publish photos of them on your blog, on Flickr, or elsewhere? Are you concerned about privacy?

Thanks for sharing. Just want to seed some conversation on this topic.


Posted by Dave Taylor at December 19, 2008 12:11 AM
Comments

Yes, you are paranoid and you cannot stop nasties seeing your children unless you stop them ever going out. They are all around you whether you like it or not, and they win because you alter your behaviour way too much to deal with them - and that alteration does NOT stop things happening. Protect your children by giving them the tools to live in the modern world - not live in the 19th century.

Posted by: Ian Nock at December 19, 2008 8:12 AM

Interesting response. I never said I wasn't letting my kids live in the 21st century, Ian, I was writing about whether *I* put pictures of them online.

Posted by: Dave Taylor at December 19, 2008 8:13 AM

I don't think you're being paranoid. I think it's important to keep pictures and names separate online, at the very least.

But then again, my dad's job is internet security and I *know* he's paranoid. I'm only just a step below that. ;-)

Posted by: Harmony at December 19, 2008 8:21 AM

Dave, I don't think you're paranoid. It's wise to give pause and consideration about things where potential safety risks exist. Just because we 'can' do something, doesn't necessarily mean we 'should' (10 points for the movie quote!). If you deem the potential risk of posting a picture of your children online to be greater than the value of doing such, then by all means don't.

That said, think about this, though. Your name is well-known, and it's pretty easy to discern what town you live in from your various online activities. Given that, I'm sure I could find where you live. Thanks to google map's street view, I could see what your home looks like. From there I could...

My point is that there's enough information about *you*, the fact that you have kids, and even when they're visiting you - out here on the web that anyone with bad intent could carry a nefarious plan. Pictures are immaterial.

Posted by: Steve Lowe at December 19, 2008 8:52 AM

I personally don't publish anything specific about my children or their activities. When I decided to publish and leave open my own photo, thoughts and feelings, personal history and probably way too much contact information; it was my call, my considered choice. I believe that children too should have that choice, and make it at a time and place they choose.

My 3 children aged 18-9 are all very active on the web and all make their own choices about what they publish. What I have noticed most is that they are all very savvy with little guidance from their parents about what they show and tell and where.

Here's the thing; it is not for me about the .01% of dubious characters out there, life is a numbers game, it can be a lottery. I protect my children but hate to cocoon them.

So with that all said I do wonder about risk minimization when I see children pictured, with their mothers invariably, on dating sites?

Or as you noted stories with names dates and places and more on Blogs(mostly for profit), when just the parable would work equally well.

Paranoid no, risk reduction yes, Most important is my child's right to choose without prompting or coercion. Their right to anonymity in the future.

Posted by: Brendan McNally at December 19, 2008 9:02 AM

Since you brought up the word paranoia, I don't feel it's insulting to say that I do think you're being a little paranoid. Not a lot paranoid, just a little. Do you have any statistics on crimes (or even just uncomfortable situations) caused by someone seeing a picture of a child online? You mentioned the 0.01% of users out there - but I suspect that's not an actual statistic (and that's okay, hyperbole is an important writing tool). To me, your level of paranoia will be more accurately defined by how you react to the actual statistics, not by what you suspect they might be.

We are constantly inundated with reports of kids getting into trouble because of the internet - child predators are lurking behind every bush according to the media. South Park did a great episode lampooning that notion. I think that knowing the real risks will help to combat this - child predators haven't suddenly started springing up because of the internet, and personally, I'd rather they be sitting at home looking at Google Images than sitting in a van outside of a school.

I'd be willing to bet that the odds of your kids getting hit by a car are greater than the odds of your kids getting into some sort of internet predator related situation - and I'm also willing to bet that you won't stop your kids from ever crossing a street ;)

Posted by: Daniel M. Clark at December 19, 2008 9:47 AM

As a dad of two young children and being professional photographer, this is indeed a predicament. I do post images of my kids and my client's kids online but only use their first names. If a client insists on not using a name at all or not blogging the images on my site, I will wholeheartedly grant them that wish. Privacy is important to me and especially for my clients.

Posted by: Seshu at December 19, 2008 10:40 AM

Dave I completely agree with you on this and only have posted photos with my children in them rarely. I also only use the first letter of their first name when referring to them in posts or tweets. Beyond the safety factor is the desire to let them make their own choices about what personal information is online.

Posted by: Jason Janelle at December 19, 2008 11:25 AM

I do put a lot of videos up of my kids on a public youtube account. When I had it private, grandma and other non-tech friends found it too tough to see stuff (registering, remembering login details a month later, etc.). The point is to keep in touch with family overseas, and I need to be able to just send then an easy URL to click on.

But I DON'T include names, descriptions, or notes on any videos. Don't even change the file names most of the time.

Your column did make me think though that I've got to set up a separate Youtube channel for business/professional and personal. The work videos would lead people to our hometown, address, etc.

Posted by: Paula at December 19, 2008 12:16 PM

I think everyone has their own personal threshold as to what they'll post or not post. It's not so much paranoia as cautiousness, in my view.

It's interesting to see how different people's thresholds are. I don't have a problem with posting photos of my children or their names, but I absolutely will *not* put my full surname on line - the reverse of the decisions you've made with regard to those points! (That said - neither of my children is yet at the age of going out alone, and my feeling is that I won't be happy posting pictures of them once they *do* reach that age.)

My own limits: I will not use our surname, and I am extremely careful about any information that could give clues as to our location. My blog's 'About' page just says that I'm in England - it used to give a general area but I deleted that bit. As well as not posting the area or town, I try to avoid posting any information that could give any clues as to where we are within the town in case anyone did figure out where the town is. Oh, and I don't post in advance when we're planning to take trips away or when we are away, because I don't like advertising that the house is empty.

Posted by: Sarah V. at December 19, 2008 3:29 PM

You are so right to be concerned. I also right a blog and talk about parenting and kids, but I don't put my kids pictures on there. I don't even use their names.

Schools, camps and churches all have websites now and fortunately most of them require a parent's permission before posting a child's picture. I never give it. Anyone would know exactly where to go to see the child.

I'm super proud of my kids and thrilled to share pictures with close family and friends, but on the web you are exposed to everyone: the good, the bad and the ugly. Even if the chance that something would happen is small, I am not willing to take that chance with my precious children.

~Karen www.WonderBerryKids.com/blog

Posted by: Karen S at December 19, 2008 3:57 PM

I have a distributed extended family all over the world, and the best way to keep them updated on my kids development, growth, funnies, etc is to take our photos online. Both my kids have blogs that I created - digital natives that they are who may one day thank me for recording their life. That said, I never reveal their names, location, or any other identity information on their blogs, so they have some anonymity from the big bad world of creeps out there - and to be honest, my direct extended family are the only folks who ever leave comments or visit regularly.

In the participation age, we all have the right to decide to contribute/publish or not, but in the absence of being to make those decisions ourselves (as is the case with my youngsters) I made the decision for them for the larger benefit and joy of our whole family. I've done it in such a way that would never compromise their well-being and my protection of it.

Posted by: Jon at December 19, 2008 8:45 PM

Its that whole personal choice thing.
My father works with many dangerous peoples as their psychologist and one thing he discovered is the more you hide the more interest you create.
I feel that if a person really wants to find out about you they will no matter how hard you try to hide….and because you are on the net and you are talking about what you talk about someone may want to find out about you and they will.

We live in the world of information that can be found.
I think the older my children get the less I will use photos... As they will change so much from their baby photos.
Just because we don't talk about our children use their names or photos does not mean that people will not find a way to look at them…even if we were not on the net people will still look if they find an interest in you.

Posted by: Megan at December 19, 2008 9:45 PM

simply put- just keep your family blogs marked private for close friends and family. Strangers have no reason to view your personal photos nor personal remarks.

Posted by: kathew at December 20, 2008 2:30 PM

I do blog. I have both a personal blog and a parenting blog, and I do post pictures on my personal blog (not so much on the parenting blog). My attitude towards the Internet and the information available has drastically changed over the last six months. Around six months ago, I stumbled upon an article (linked below) that discusses the Internet and how it has changed the way kids do everything. It made me realize that I needed to change some of my attitudes so that I'd be better prepared when my baby isn't a baby anymore. Hence my blogging started. (So I'm just an infant blogger.)

It's true that even though I don't use last names and I don't specifically mention in which state I live, you could probably figure it all out. It's also true that with pictures you know what my family and I look like. But people who are motivated always find a way. I'm hoping that as my little munchkin grows up, my husband and I can teach her how to protect herself against predators (Internet photos or no).

Great Article Regarding the Internet:
http://nymag.com/news/features/27341/

Posted by: Katie at December 23, 2008 11:29 AM

I have to say I feel the same way. It is way too easy for some pervert to go online and check out pictures of kids. Gross. Especially on the cloth diapering forum I frequent. I can only imagine how many sick people go to sites like that. Its disturbing.

Posted by: Beth at December 28, 2008 5:50 PM

I don't think you're being paranoid entirely. There ARE of course lots of bad people out there, and yes, if they want to find you or your family, they will no matter what you post on the 'net. But there's no reason to just GIVE them that information. I think it's okay to post some pictures, but I don't think it's necessary to post details, even names.

Posted by: Lindsay at January 10, 2009 8:08 PM

I agree with you. While researching schools and homeschooling, I have been able to find out far more details of other people than they realise just by reading their blogs and their forum postings. The realisation made me lock up my own blog! :)

Posted by: Iris at January 20, 2009 1:28 PM

I am having this discussion with another person right now and just do not understand the "fear". If a person knows your name and that you have kids it is pretty easy to track you, and them down. Putting or not putting a picture up changes nothing.

- Predator Tracks Child Down Based on Internet Photo -

Can you find one example of this ever actually happening? I do not remember ever seeing a "To Catch a Predator" episode where anything other than something like MySpace or AIM was used and... it was the kids (NOT the parents) that put themselves at risk. I have never seen an instance where a predator picks some child at random, on the internet, and track them down.

The odds that someone will molest your child favor Family... then Friends.. then Neighbors. They only way I could imagine that someone would go out of there way for YOUR kid is if hey had some sort of personal vendetta against YOU.

I have looked though many lists like this one http://wordpress.com/tag/child-predator/ and can find no such occurrence.

I was molested as a child and told my Mom right away. My mother listened to my story and took me to the police. It turned out the the local community "nice guy" was having his way with a lot of neighborhood boys... for years.

Be a proud parent. Teach your kids to talk to you. Be aware. But not posting pictures up because it makes you feel safer. Sorry, not buying it.

Posted by: Dan at January 20, 2009 1:42 PM

I don't think posting pictures of your family is a bad thing or something you need to worry about. It's the information that is available that people need to be careful about. You should not post any of your personal information, or you're just asking for trouble (ID Theft for 1). People who look on the website with bad intentions do not spend a lot of time trying to find information. If your blog doesn't contain full names, address, etc then they'll move on. This is why our blog has no peronal info. Every now and then a post may refer to a person or place, but that's it. Basically, don't put on your blog your full name, address, place of work, ages, etc etc etc...never put this information on line

Posted by: Big Daddy H at January 22, 2009 12:16 PM

I agree with you, don't show faces or give any details, how can we teach our children not to give out personal information on social sites if we're doing it on their account?

Posted by: Ann at February 8, 2009 10:24 PM

I am trying to determine the actual risk here. What could happen? We have to determine what could happen and spell that out before trying to protect against it.

As mentioned above, if somebody just had it out for Dave's, because they were Dave's kids, well, they could find his house and done deal. The lack of photos of them online does not matter too much. That is just one scenario, though.

Do not want photos of your children being used in child pornography? Well, I doubt any photos we put up would be.

I have been thinking a lot about this issue lately when I (as a photographer) was asked to remove some shots of a friend's children from a website. I did, out of respect, but I just cannot figure out what the real life danger is. Maybe I am just not savvy in the ways of the world, but could you all help me out a little here?

Posted by: Cooper Strange at March 10, 2009 10:29 PM

i dont think you are paranoid at all. Although there are many people in my family that have pictures of my children, any photos that i have on line, are ones without being close-ups. They are pictures distanced while they are wearing costumes, sunglasses, hats ect. I think that people such as ourselves, who are just looking to be a support to other parents and support for ourselves cant even fathom how easy it is for that one creep to find your info. You cant even imagine how easy it is for a picture to lead things to places you wouldn't want people to know. If that wasn't the case, then there wouldn't be so much identity theft and child abductions. much luck to you and your family.
heidi

Posted by: Heidi at June 10, 2009 2:34 PM

Definitely not paranoid... I belong to an online forum for a kids clothing brand. A lot of the mom's do fashion shows of their kids as each new line comes out. A couple of weeks ago, one of the mom's discovered a photo of someone's daughter being used to sell clothing on a Chinese ebay-type site. No permission granted, just totally picked up from the forum pages and used to sell clothing on the other side of the world. Pretty scary stuff. Fortunately the mother succeeded in getting them to take the photo down. Goodness knows what other creeps lurk on these sites and steal kids photos for who knows what. It just proves that nothing posted online is really secure.

Posted by: Jennifer at June 30, 2009 9:10 AM

I recommend reading "Free Range Parenting." It's a wonderful balancing perspective for Attachment Parents. I tend to agree with the comments where it's more of an urban myth and statistically less of a risk than many other "normal" activities with our children. It was very interesting to read everyone's thoughts; many good points.

Posted by: Angie at May 10, 2010 10:24 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Please note that you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.






About This Blog

Attachment Parenting
Articles and Information
Lijit Search
Subscribe!
Subscribe to this site with RDF Subscribe to this site using XML


Link to Us

Attachment Parenting
News and Updates
updated twice daily
Other Sites to Visit

All The Weblog Entries
 • Interviews, interviews: let's talk!
 • My son is finally having a deep night's sleep
 • Is Attachment Parenting relevant as kids grow up?
 • My blog and guest posts...
 • British soldiers escaped WWII POW camps with Monopoly?
 • How do you establish a post-cosleeping bedtime?
 • The problem with hiring a chauffeur for your kids
 • The importance of friends & family in your baby's life
 • Review: fun, huge building blocks: Brik-a-Blok
 • Looking for an über-chic hotel in San Diego?
 • Weird Pic Caption Contest
 • Research: Why your match.com email doesn't lead to dates
 • The Story Behind Cirque du Soleil's The Beatles LOVE
 • Finding your sex appeal after divorce
 • Should your ex show up at events when it's your time?
 • Honey, it's our fetus on the phone again!
 • Avoiding stress while raising two 4mo boys?
 • How do you refer to "the person you're seeing" when you're an adult?
 • Reality TV Show Casting Call!
 • Sleepovers: our place or theirs?
 • Attachment parenting and babysitters
 • Fighting H1N1 with a cool soap dispenser
 • Dad + daughter's hair: an inherent disaster?
 • Jif Peanut Butter is gluten-free, but ...
 • The economics of driving a taxi in Las Vegas
 • For me, the Hilton Grand Vacation Club timeshare numbers didn't end up working
 • The challenge of finding appropriate girls Halloween costumes
 • Ah, those fun phone calls from your kids...
 • Teaching Internet Safety: I need resources
 • My thoughts on the new 2010 Ford Taurus
 • How do you add a second baby to the family bed?
 • Standards of Positive Sportsmanship
 • President Obama's address: are your kids going to listen?
 • 7 Essential Resources to See If Your Neighborhood is Safe
 • Review: Panasonic ES 8249 electric razor
 • Ten days without my kids and...
 • Win some free Bach "Daydream Remedy"
 • The sublime pleasures of hot summer days and a pool
 • Are stupid people more likely to die from a heart attack?
 • How my iPhone helps me use the public library
 • Surviving the summer with my kids
 • Stepping out of my comfort zone on Father's Day weekend
 • Strategies for coping with gestational diabetes?
 • Activities for you to do with your baby on a rainy day
 • "Imagination Movers" and the quality of children's music
 • Are slings a simple solution for babies with colic?
 • Photo Shoot: Colorado Railroad Museum in Miniature
 • Memories of our journey to NYC on the Queen Mary
 • Share an offbeat NBA stat, win tickets to the All-Star game!
 • Is co-sleeping a barrier to divorce?
 • The 100 Hour Test Drive: 2009 Ford Mercury Mariner Hybrid
 • Do you have a college trust set up for your kids?
 • Learning how to shave again?
 • Can you still be considered an attachment parent if you use a stroller?
 • Review: "State of Play" with Russell Crowe, Ben Affleck and Rachel McAdams
 • Mama needs help: baby wakes her up every night
 • Babywearing: it's not just for babies!
 • What's more important, a parenting schedule or the needs of the kids?
 • Why I like living here in Boulder, Colorado
 • The dreaded evening call from the ex's house
 • Secret skill: I can paint ceramics!
 • The winning wry Valentine's Day haikus!
 • Interview with former AMC TV host Bob Dorian
 • Does Attachment Parenting "Break" a Child?
 • Review: Cirque du Soleil "O"
 • Leave a wry haiku, win $70 gift cert for Proflowers for Vday
 • The First Sleepover: Success Strategies?
 • Cirque du Soleil "O" -- Behind the Scenes!
 • Talking with your children while at a trade show
 • FDA approves Latisse: drug to lengthen your eyelashes
 • Are Chore Charts the Answer to Holding Children Accountable?
 • Do you publish photographs of your children online?
 • Is Gluten-free food and cooking just a fad?
 • A working mom's perspective on attachment parenting
 • Are movies too violent, or is cinema just evolving?
 • The fun little pond rug I got for the kids room...
 • What's with streamers being thrown at MLS soccer games?
 • Attachment parenting and Waldorf school helps keep your kids slim?
 • What will Halloween look like in twenty years?
 • How you can really help eradicate global poverty
 • My son gets his tonsils removed, and it's a success!
 • Film Review: "Eagle Eye"
 • Review: Cirque du Soleil: The Beatles LOVE, Las Vegas
 • I don't want to meet Candace Bushnell's Sex And The City women as teens
 • How did my 4yo learn how to do this stuff?
 • My visit to the Democratic National Convention in Denver
 • How to ensure safety while letting my daughter get her own email address?
 • When you need to keep track of your nursing schedule
 • Why do people divorce, and how can you heal from a divorce?
 • Hey Dads, don't give up on your kids!
 • The dangers of going off-schedule: The day from Hell
 • Finally, my kids are ready to enjoy art galleries!
 • Hey Mattel! Now you can put Bratz to sleep once and for all
 • Good adventure books for 8yo boy?
 • Flip-flops for a good cause, spread the word
 • The power of reflective listening
 • How we're managing Video Game Time
 • How do you meter video game playing time?
 • Press Release: Divorced Women's Dating Styles
 • Signing "Ask for ID" on my credit cards invalidates them?
 • ... and still, sometimes bedtime just stinks
 • Taste Test: Hansen's Junior Water
 • I'm a movie geek, I admit it
 • How do you explain sex and "Free Condoms!" to your kids?
 • The Secret Joy of a Proper Child Residence Arrangement
 • How do single dads (and working mothers) cope with summer holiday?
 • Fun, random photographs from our Hawaiian Holiday
 • Overheard: exactly the wrong way to tutor someone
 • AudibleKids: Fun new site for kid's audio books
 • When did shopping online become such a drag?
 • Singing my children to sleep....
 • Inventing kinder, gentler games for the kids
 • Tourists and product stickers...
 • Finding the balance between "honoring their voice" and avoiding chaos
 • The anniversary of my daughter's conception...
 • Q&A with Spain Dad: Daddy Blogs and The Issue of Privacy
 • Single rooms and single parents: travel logistics in hotels
 • Like poison in a well: of kids and bad moods
 • Should children be paid to do chores?
 • Why the caucus system leaves me frustrated and disenfranchised
 • The weirdness of visiting the old family home
 • The wisdom of Solomon: splitting up with animals
 • What's the proper protocol for a sleepover?
 • Is having "cybersex" cheating on a relationship?
 • When do you take your wedding ring off?
 • Where does dryer lint come from?
 • Riding out the waves of a bad mood...
 • New Age Psychobabble or not? You decide
 • Kitty etiquette question...
 • Does anyone have an MP3 version of "Parenting with Love and Logic"?
 • Innovation: A stuffed animal with a built-in pacifier?
 • Ah, I screwed up: How would you resolve the problem?
 • The kids definitely say "Happy Hannukah!"
 • Is there such a thing as "REM motion"?
 • Very cool job: Executive Director of the Men's Leadership Alliance
 • Should children face their fears, or avoid scary stuff?
 • Michael Medved and I are pretty aligned on favorite films
 • Yech! Men never wash their hands in the bathroom!
 • Fun magazine for 2-5 year olds: Tessy & Tab Reading Club
 • Do most kids actually eat all the Halloween candy they get?
 • Custody and separation: Where do the children play?
 • How to deal with the no-TV versus TV parents?
 • Lots of TV viewing correlated with ADD. Well, duh.
 • Dress up as a "dementor", screw up your soul forever
 • Of classes and birthday party invitations...
 • Finally, school starts up!
 • Why is that name so familiar? The serendipity of blogging
 • True confession: I prefer English candy bars too
 • Family game night? Our take on some of the best...
 • Are we the lone holdouts from the Nintendo generation?
 • Is "Agents for Home Buyers" a Real Estate Scam?
 • Is it possible to set nursing boundaries without actually weaning?
 • Cosleeping, Age Appropriateness and Nudity
 • Life in the 'burbs: babysitter poker?
 • We heard back from Norwegian Cruise Lines. Sorta
 • Back from holiday, drowning in bad juju?
 • Of videotaping school plays and burning DVDs
 • The dark side of our Norwegian Star cruise: embarkation and disembarkation
 • General Pace says homosexuality is immoral. So?
 • Of Food, Norovirus and Excursions on our Norwegian Star Cruise...
 • Our Norwegian Star Cruise to the Mexican Riviera
 • Do kids in Waldorf schools start reading too late?
 • Do News Stories About Breastfeeding Help or Hinder?
 • Do you have to breastfeed to be an attachment parent?
 • Internet access and cell phone service on the Norwegian Star?
 • Best foods to help kids get to sleep
 • Today was the Day From Hell with our 2yo
 • Adventures in Weather: The Blizzard of 2006
 • Why I don't like gift cards as presents
 • Nursing, Breast pumps, and travel plans
 • Do you ever lie to your kids?
 • Can't get her kids to sleep, she needs help!
 • Children maturing too fast? Control their media exposure
 • Can breastfeeding and formula-feeding moms remain friends?
 • Should younger children say "sorry" after doing something wrong?
 • How do you deal with aging, sick dogs?
 • Japanese "Gender Equality" minister opposes maiden names?
 • We Survived Chickenpox!
 • The flower fairy waits for no-one
 • Does Mom's Diet Affect the Quality of Breastmilk?
 • Kids don't need to know how to program computers
 • I thought we'd eliminated DDT, but ...
 • Fun holiday activities: bicycling and bowling
 • Why does it take lawsuits for companies to listen?
 • Got a cute book about breastfeeding
 • How to avoid overscheduling your children
 • We must be the only parents who dislike Tinker Bell
 • In-dash DVD players for cars gain in popularity? Are they insane?
 • Do your kids need more exercise?
 • The secret to happy moms: plastic surgery?
 • Where can I buy our kids new ears?
 • Banning cell phones in cars: good idea or bad?
 • 80% of children under two watch HOW much media per day?
 • Children's Tylenol with Flavor Creator: Drug or Candy?
 • Trapped with abusive parent in airplane for five hours!
 • Journaling the Joys and Fears of Pregnancy, A Workshop
 • Why do so many people use F$#@$# obscenities?
 • Disney Mobile: The first innovation out of Disney in a long time
 • Wal*Mart expands into natural and organic foods
 • Who knew blacksmith work was so darn fun?
 • Who buys this stuff for their kids?
 • Driving with a whiny baby must be the third circle of Hell
 • My daughter the knitting machine!
 • Learn how to swim in a spa?
 • Distance needed between doctors and Big Pharma?
 • Ways to know whether your infant could be teething
 • Teach your baby sign language
 • Why don't companies stick behind their products? Maclaren Strollers, Inc.
 • What happened to quality control with toys?
 • Could we all just buy a bit less each year?
 • Coke and Pepsi: Liability from selling soda in schools?
 • Acupuncture for Children and Adults
 • I survived my day at the zoo with five 9yo girls!
 • Why comic books aren't so terrible for kids
 • Kids as philosophers, or finding meaning in skeeball
 • What would happen to your children if you died?
 • When did Halloween become so darn dangerous?
 • Why it's foolish to underestimate your children
 • One big reason we don't take our kids to the movie theater
 • Of cheating spouses and spanking parents
 • Research shows prolonged crying lowers IQ in babies
 • Why are ex-husbands sometimes such jerks?
 • Why we don't hit our kids
 • Is there anything cuter than baby talk?
 • Can children survive without corn syrup?
 • 5yo boy + pair of scissors = scary haircut!
 • Don't forget to tell your kids you love them!
 • "Amazing Amanda" crushes imagination with servos and RFID
 • Jury duty scam leads to identity theft
 • The lure of being single again?
 • A curious travel question: irons in hotel rooms?
 • EPA tacitly endorses testing pesticides on children?
 • What is Attachment Parenting?
 • Why can't we buy or sell a used carseat?
 • An Ethical Dilemma: Someone in your school is a registered sex offender?
 • FTC touts kids see fewer TV ads selling food, but the study is predictably bogus
 • I'm proud of my sister's beautiful art!
 • Avoiding work at home scams
 • Bras designed for girls growing up fast
 • Babies have personalities!
 • Those darn too long days of summer
 • Breast is still best, even if it's Dad's??
 • Travel tips for families this summer
 • How Computers Make Our Kids Stupid
 • Why parents associate summer with spending
 • Dave's secret trick for calming a hysterical child
 • Sometimes being right is far less important than just having fun
 • Warning: never let your baby play with the phone!
 • Parenting as talking to a brick wall?
 • Another of those "only a parent would laugh" moments
 • My journey to becoming an Attachment Parenting Dad
 • Should a man wear a wedding ring?
 • An AP parent on the benefit of no-media children
 • The perfect washer, or social engineering at its worst?
 • Take your Parents to School Day?
 • First week of weight gain sets lifelong weight patterns? I don't think so.
 • EPA cancels pesticide tests on Floridian babies
 • Standing your ground with discipline
 • Jack Welch says: forget it. You can't balance business and personal life
 • PBS introduces "PBS Kids Sprout" a new digital babysitter
 • Why are kid-friendly bathrooms so hard to find?
 • When does bedtime become other than a nightmare?
 • The Little Boy and the Monkeys: Children's picture book, needs pictures....
 • More schools are saying "no" to brands and logos
 • Why do so many men cheat on their spouses?
 • What's the toughest thing about being a father?
 • Breastfeeding and the Law
 • Waldorf Schools and the challenge of values-based organizations
 • We'll help you pick a great baby name!
 • How come parents never talk about parenting?
 • Another reason to be suspicious of parenting book authors
 • Scholastic succumbs to the siren song of corporate sponsorship of education
 • What would you suggest to this tired Mom?
 • What dreams have you dreamt today?
 • Vaccinations and the fear of getting sick
 • The challenge of being The Toy Police during the Holidays
 • Eventually, just about every kid has homework
 • The essence of good toys
 • Giving up on Privacy as part of Parenting
 • Five million reasons per year to discourage your kids from smoking
 • ... And on Halloween, the Candy Fairy Visited Our House!
 • A house full of sick children
 • More Dads are spending more time with their children
 • Are all children inveterate collectors?
 • How loud is too loud? How much should children be protected?
 • A Conference to Attend: Waldorf in the Home
 • Our long-term birth control option of choice: a vasectomy
 • What's one word that never shows up in parenting books?
 • Kindergarten Boarding School
 • Breastfed babies make happier adults?
 • Is Your Adoption Agency Legit?
 • Coming soon: Articles from "The Compleat Mother"
 • Father's Day and the Conundrum of Modern Economics
 • The real challenge of cosleeping: bed space!
 • Happy Mother's Day?
 • Update on bicycles and training wheels
 • Win a $25 Amazon Gift Certificate for adding a link!
 • When is a baby too young for a stroller?
 • A key attachment parenting virtue: patience
 • Taxes, Money and Debt. The big three?
 • A biological reason for teen laziness?
 • Is a toy without a microchip heresy?
 • Can't get your baby immobilized at night? Now there's a solution
 • Google likes Shining Light Books
 • Dealing with irrational fears
 • New Babies and Baby Names
 • Happy New Year!
 • Things really do unfold when it's time
 • Safe Surfing for Your Children
 • The Ebbs and Flows of Attachment Parenting
 • Sometimes you get a brief glimpse of what will be...
 • Funny Waldorf Lightbulb Jokes
 • Australian debate on breastfeeding
 • Scary bike accident, resilient children
 • A week of firsts...
 • Attachment Parenting Thought for the week
 • The Joy of Consistency
 • More on rhythms and summertime
 • The importance of schedules, even in the summer
 • "Eating your own dogfood"
 • Strategies pay off, sometimes
 • Chaos is sure to ensue!
 • When they're not ready to sleep...
 • Sleep Deprivation: The Essential Attachment Parenting Experience
 • Welcome Aboard!