Attachment Parenting Blog: Raising Children with Love

Run by an attachment parenting dad with three kids, this site is your best place to learn more about attachment parenting, keep up-to-date on parenting news, and much more.



An AP parent on the benefit of no-media children

While reading a Waldorf education related mailing list, I came across this thoughtful and interesting message from Kimberley Weaver, and, with her gracious permission, I'm reproducing it here for your reading enjoyment.

I had a similar experience with my kids when I was pregnant. I had severe morning sickness through most of my pregnancies and during my third my husband was working full-time *and* doing his PhD. So, my kids watched more TV than normal while I was pregnant.

That being said, they still watched a bit every day until we noticed problems two years ago with my 4yr old daughter and her reaction to media. That coupled with a switch to Waldorf education lead us to walk down the no-media path.

It was a fairly rough transition at first and my daughter (4 at the time) rebelled against it quite heavily. I even noticed it was rough for my 2yr old who really didn't know how to play on his own when his sister was at kindergarten and the two of them seemed a bit lost for the first few weeks.

BUT, the good news is that it's pretty wonderful to see everything that happens on the other side of the fence. I'd had some resistance from my family over the no media decision and they would try to sneak in TV for my deprived children when we were around, but my mother quickly came around to our side when she saw just how different the children's play was. All of a sudden my kids didn't need to be entertained. There was no sense of panic when we didn't have plans outside the house or the weather outside was bad.

My kids had to go through the withdrawal pains of being entertained by the tube towards a new path of being able to entertain themselves. There's nothing like a little boredom to bring out some ingenuity and my kids quickly realized that if they didn't figure out something to do, they'd have nothing to do.

So, I absolutely do not believe that the opportunity is EVER lost for anyone to reap the benefits of no-media. I am seriously considering getting rid of our TV completely because the kids can go weeks without watching anything but I need to check in with a few shows a week. I don't like the example it sets for the kids and I feel like I'm being hypocritical to tell them that they aren't allowed to watch TV while they know that some nights I put them to bed and watch it myself.

Yes, it's never too late for any of us to benefit from the opportunities. All I can say is that I'm glad that we persevered with the kids because it was the best thing we ever did (aside from finding our local Waldorf school) as my kids are so much happier and better adjusted not watching TV. They know how to play and how to communicate with others kids in a real way instead of just regurgitating what they've watched on TV.

In taking away the TV, it's given our children the gift of knowing themselves and being able to answer the question "What do you want to do" with any number of ideas, none of which include whatever's on TV at the time. Hang in there!!!

We're AP'ers too. Our 2.5yr old still sleeps on a crib mattress on the floor beside our bed every night. I think that Waldorf education is a natural fit for attachment parents as it respects many of the lifestyle choices that are made. It's not uncommon to have extended nursing, cosleeping, etc in our Waldorf school where we'd be looked at as monsters with three heads in the public system!

We were AP long before we had any experience with WE or a media-free lifestyle for our kids. Something never quite gelled for me when we'd let the kids sleep in our bedroom at night and then just dump them in front of a TV during the day (not all day, but still...). At that time, I just didn't have all the information and experience for it to crystallize into an understanding until we felt the pressure from the kindergarten teachers at our local Waldorf school when we went for the kids' interviews to join the school.

At that point we didn't watch a lot of TV but I felt like we wouldn't belong or fit in if the kids watched TV so that was the main impetus for us to go cold turkey. I swear to the fact that I have different kids a year and a half later. They can make an adventure out of collecting sticks in the backyard to make a bonfire for gnomes, chasing the dogs around the living room and listening to stories we tell or books we read with much more enthusiasm than they ever watched TV.

By far the most important thing is the difference it's made in their sense of fear. They just weren't able to process all the images on TV and it would give them nightmares and make them very scared that the bizarre pictures on the screen could actually happen in real life.

My kids aren't scared any longer from what they've seen on TV. I find they're much more compassionate too as they have real interactions with other human beings instead of learning how to treat others from the "role models" presented by today's children's programming.


Posted by Dave Taylor at May 3, 2005 9:32 PM
Comments

I agree that the media can be damaging to just about anyone who experiences it. However, I believe that we ALL experience it on a daily basis, whether or not we plan to. What we need is to learn how to deal with it, to think critically, not the shelter ourselves or our kids from it.

We've gone back and forth on whether or not to even have a TV in our house. At first, we had one and kept it in the den with no antenna connected, just to watch movies when we wanted. Now, though, we have it in the living room, and we all have things we like to watch. It has been important to us, though, that we not plan our day around a show's time. If we feel like watching, we turn it on and see if there's anything we want to watch. Often, there's not, and we turn it right back off.

Also, I taught my boys at a young age to push the "commercial button" (mute button) whenever a commercial comes on. I think this alone has been a huge contributor to them not wanting everything they see in the stores.

But, looking at the big picture, we just felt that it was important not to shelter our kids from anything in reason (porn, for example, is not allowed). We do expose them gradually, though. We're in tune with what our kids feel they can handle and what they can't. We feel that they will have to learn how to face the media and deal with it someday, and we want to help them develop the tools to handle it critically. We talk with them (actually, they do most of the talking) during a show, about what happened, if someone was doing something that was mean or nice, if something is real or not, etc.

My boys are capable of having real conversations, and rarely are they based on anything they saw on TV. I've gotten comments just about everywhere we've gone on what wonderful, compassionate boys we've got. They're deeply empathic, and voluntarily share just about everything they get.

I just don't think that sheltering from the media is the answer. Helping them learn to think critically is. And, if they don't have anything to be critical about, it's a tough lesson!

Posted by: Alex at May 7, 2005 12:18 PM

Alex, your children are darn lucky to have you as a Dad. I think that some of the blanket zero media policy is a reaction to the 'tv as babysitter' where people assume that, for example, if their kids are watching Nickelodeon, or Disney, that it's all perfectly age appropriate and instructional or, at least, entertaining. Both channels have some good shows, but for every child that watches any TV with their parent and talks about how they're being manipulated there are at least 1,000 children who just sit and let it all flow in, not distinguishing between program, advert and anything else that might appear.

There are studies that show convincingly (to me, at least) that TV does affect brain waves and attention span, among other things, and anecdotally I can tell which children watch lots of TV versus those that watch little or none just by observing their behavior in a group setting. There are other studies that dispute this, but as with any research, it's informative to know who has funded it and what their agenda is.

Finally, you're exactly right that you can't shelter the kids completely. We aren't luddites, we don't go out of our way to avoid highways with billboards or avoid restaurants that have TVs on. But with younger children, I absolutely believe that less media = more imagination, less media = more active play, and less media = healthier children.

Posted by: Dave Taylor at May 7, 2005 6:35 PM

I'm also a believer in no tv for my daughter. She's 10 months old now, and I don't plan on letting her watch ANY tv until she's three, and then only in tiny increments.

That said, I found this statement by Kimberly Weaver off-putting: "It's not uncommon to have extended nursing, cosleeping, etc in our Waldorf school where we'd be looked at as monsters with three heads in the public system!"

I teach in the public school system, and I don't view extended b/f or cosleeping as monstrous at all. The desire to associate with people who share common parenting practices is understandable; you don't need to constantly explain yourself or your motives. Still, there's a fine line between simple association and exclusivity, and implying that the "public system" is a single entity with a single mode of thinking denies teachers, parents, and students like those I work with the humanity they deserve.

Not just a cog in the wheel,


Joanne

Posted by: Joanne at May 7, 2005 8:13 PM

Good point, Joanne, but if I may, you are quite the exception, not the rule in my experience, at least. There's no question, there are lots of excellent public school teachers, but would you not agree that there are a lot of teachers and administrators in public schools that are skeptical of anything that's not directly in the mainstream?

Posted by: Dave Taylor at May 7, 2005 10:12 PM

Actually, I'm the Mom, not the Dad! Don't worry -- I get that a lot!

I wasn't meaning at all to discredit your views. I just wanted to share what decision we've come up with on this issue. And, this brings me to a terific point -- most parents don't give two seconds to their parenting decisions. When you ask many parents -- new or otherwise -- what they plan on doing in a particular situation (i.e. watching TV, spanking/discipline, education), they have no idea. They just figure that it'll all come to them. Well, coming from a childhood which didn't provide me with the role models that I can accept, I have to make EVERY decision as if I didn't have any previous knowledge of it.

So, yes, we've thought and talked at length on the subject of watching TV. We've come to the conclusion that, just as the Buddha taught, the middle path is the way. That it's all about balance. I really hate to bring out this worn-out, tired comparison, but, my husband and I both grew up watching loads of TV, went to public schools, and had very little in the way of good-quality, imaginative toys. We had Barbie, GI Joe, and the like. And, we both grew up to be pretty good adults, if I do say so myself. We've both gone to college, my husband went on to be a Software Engineer, and I'm going to medical school to be a Naturopathic Physician. We discuss almost every parenting decision we make. We discuss religion/spirituality/philosophy virtually every day.

So, we really thought about it. What if the TV alone isn't really the problem? What if leaving children alone to deal with something so decidedly grown-up is the real problem? So, we talked about what would be a necessary accompaniment to our children watching TV. And, since we both decided that we had shows that we watched as kids that we fondly remembered, we wanted our kids to have that option, too. So, we came to the conclusion that, if our kids were to watch TV, they needed to also develop the critical thinking skills to not be completely absorbed by it. So, we frequently talk with them about what they see on TV. Personally, I think it's the only way to watch TV -- with a critical eye.

Frankly, the shows my boys enjoy the most are on The Discovery Channel -- shows about astronomy, dinosaurs, and machines! And, not the kids' versions of these informative shows -- the regular ones!

We can't and don't take complete credit for how wonderful our kids are. We feel very lucky that we got these two incredible boys!

I hate to drag this out, but I just have to comment on another factor in our decision to let our kids watch TV. We don't know where they'll go to school, yet, but we know that most kids do watch TV. We don't want to ostracize them by forcing them to live their lives so differently than their friends' lives. It's all a part of our philosophy that life must be a balance.

Thanks for letting me post our views!

Posted by: Alex at May 9, 2005 8:20 AM

Thanks again for posting, Alex. I assure you that I don't expect everyone will share our views on eating, media, discipline, etc etc and that on the continuum of completely permissive and unplugged to hyper-restrictive and ridiculously involved, we're, um, somewhere on it. :-)

But life isn't black and white, and short of buying an island and banning airwaves, it's well neigh impossible to completely eliminate media from our lives and that's why we aren't 100% anti-media, as much as it may come across that way sometimes. During the summer months we'll occasionally let our children watch a DVD, we watched some of the Olympics (though TiVO helped us skip the ads) and so on.

I think it's more a matter of degree. Your children are absolutely blessed to have you as a mother, Alex, but the vast majority of kids are not taught anything about discerning media intake, and they'll watch four hours of worthless violent age-inappropriate garbage without blinking an eye (literally). It's no longer the case that the label of 'children's tv' is helpful either -- the ads during childrens shows (particularly for other shows) are sometimes shockingly inappropriate.

Life must be a balance. I couldn't agree more, but as a parent of young children, I'm still going to try and tip the scale in my favor and to be consistent with my views, ethics and morals. Don't you?

Posted by: Dave Taylor at May 9, 2005 2:50 PM

Hi Dave,

Thanks for the comments. I think there are *lots* of people - not just teachers and administrators - who raise an eyebrow over anything that deviates from mainstream childrearing practices. I guess I'm just lucky to live near San Francisco. AP philosophy is just not that big a deal where I live and work.

Best,

Joanne

Posted by: Joanne at May 9, 2005 10:34 PM

What about older kids? We have an 8 year old boy, and he watches almost no TV - just Jamie Oliver (cooking show, movies (family movie night once a week - mostly classics that I - a film buff - pick out)and the occasional documentary. Probably 3 hours a week average.

The real media concern we have is with computers and computer games. Both his mother and I work on computers at home, and he has gotten into computer games (which I also have been known to play) - and ALL his friends are into them (PC, XBox, PS2, Game Boy, etc.). We limit him to 2.5 hours a week - half hour on Thurs when he has a friend over, and then a half hour morning and evening Sat and Sun...

But his mother doesn't like it much - too many of the games are violence/conflict-centered - and I worry about physiological effects - I have RSI, and worry about his eyes, etc. Which is why he gets no more than a half hour at a stretch...

Posted by: Nick at May 18, 2005 7:58 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Please note that you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.



Attachment Parenting
Articles and Information
Lijit Search
Syndicate This Weblog

Syndicate this site Syndicate this site using XML


Link to Us
Attachment Parenting
News and Updates
Other Sites to Visit
Fun: Ask Yahoo!

All The Weblog Entries
 • Fun, random photographs from our Hawaiian Holiday
 • Overheard: exactly the wrong way to tutor someone
 • AudibleKids: Fun new site for kid's audio books
 • When did shopping online become such a drag?
 • Singing my children to sleep....
 • Inventing kinder, gentler games for the kids
 • Tourists and product stickers...
 • Finding the balance between "honoring their voice" and avoiding chaos
 • The anniversary of my daughter's conception...
 • Q&A with Spain Dad: Daddy Blogs and The Issue of Privacy
 • Single rooms and single parents: travel logistics in hotels
 • Like poison in a well: of kids and bad moods
 • Should children be paid to do chores?
 • Why the caucus system leaves me frustrated and disenfranchised
 • The weirdness of visiting the old family home
 • The wisdom of Solomon: splitting up with animals
 • What's the proper protocol for a sleepover?
 • Is having "cybersex" cheating on a relationship?
 • When do you take your wedding ring off?
 • Where does dryer lint come from?
 • Riding out the waves of a bad mood...
 • New Age Psychobabble or not? You decide
 • Kitty etiquette question...
 • Does anyone have an MP3 version of "Parenting with Love and Logic"?
 • Innovation: A stuffed animal with a built-in pacifier?
 • Ah, I screwed up: How would you resolve the problem?
 • The kids definitely say "Happy Hannukah!"
 • Is there such a thing as "REM motion"?
 • Very cool job: Executive Director of the Men's Leadership Alliance
 • Should children face their fears, or avoid scary stuff?
 • Michael Medved and I are pretty aligned on favorite films
 • Yech! Men never wash their hands in the bathroom!
 • Fun magazine for 2-5 year olds: Tessy & Tab Reading Club
 • Do most kids actually eat all the Halloween candy they get?
 • Custody and separation: Where do the children play?
 • How to deal with the no-TV versus TV parents?
 • Lots of TV viewing correlated with ADD. Well, duh.
 • Dress up as a "dementor", screw up your soul forever
 • Of classes and birthday party invitations...
 • Finally, school starts up!
 • Why is that name so familiar? The serendipity of blogging
 • True confession: I prefer English candy bars too
 • Family game night? Our take on some of the best...
 • Are we the lone holdouts from the Nintendo generation?
 • Is "Agents for Home Buyers" a Real Estate Scam?
 • Is it possible to set nursing boundaries without actually weaning?
 • Cosleeping, Age Appropriateness and Nudity
 • Life in the 'burbs: babysitter poker?
 • We heard back from Norwegian Cruise Lines. Sorta
 • Back from holiday, drowning in bad juju?
 • Of videotaping school plays and burning DVDs
 • The dark side of our Norwegian Star cruise: embarkation and disembarkation
 • General Pace says homosexuality is immoral. So?
 • Of Food, Norovirus and Excursions on our Norwegian Star Cruise...
 • Our Norwegian Star Cruise to the Mexican Riviera
 • Do kids in Waldorf schools start reading too late?
 • Do News Stories About Breastfeeding Help or Hinder?
 • Do you have to breastfeed to be an attachment parent?
 • Internet access and cell phone service on the Norwegian Star?
 • Best foods to help kids get to sleep
 • Today was the Day From Hell with our 2yo
 • Adventures in Weather: The Blizzard of 2006
 • Why I don't like gift cards as presents
 • Nursing, Breast pumps, and travel plans
 • Do you ever lie to your kids?
 • Can't get her kids to sleep, she needs help!
 • Children maturing too fast? Control their media exposure
 • Can breastfeeding and formula-feeding moms remain friends?
 • Should younger children say "sorry" after doing something wrong?
 • How do you deal with aging, sick dogs?
 • Japanese "Gender Equality" minister opposes maiden names?
 • We Survived Chickenpox!
 • The flower fairy waits for no-one
 • Does Mom's Diet Affect the Quality of Breastmilk?
 • Kids don't need to know how to program computers
 • I thought we'd eliminated DDT, but ...
 • Fun holiday activities: bicycling and bowling
 • Why does it take lawsuits for companies to listen?
 • Got a cute book about breastfeeding
 • How to avoid overscheduling your children
 • We must be the only parents who dislike Tinker Bell
 • In-dash DVD players for cars gain in popularity? Are they insane?
 • Do your kids need more exercise?
 • The secret to happy moms: plastic surgery?
 • Where can I buy our kids new ears?
 • Banning cell phones in cars: good idea or bad?
 • 80% of children under two watch HOW much media per day?
 • Children's Tylenol with Flavor Creator: Drug or Candy?
 • Trapped with abusive parent in airplane for five hours!
 • Journaling the Joys and Fears of Pregnancy, A Workshop
 • Why do so many people use F$#@$# obscenities?
 • Disney Mobile: The first innovation out of Disney in a long time
 • Wal*Mart expands into natural and organic foods
 • Who knew blacksmith work was so darn fun?
 • Who buys this stuff for their kids?
 • Driving with a whiny baby must be the third circle of Hell
 • My daughter the knitting machine!
 • Learn how to swim in a spa?
 • Distance needed between doctors and Big Pharma?
 • Ways to know whether your infant could be teething
 • Teach your baby sign language
 • Why don't companies stick behind their products? Maclaren Strollers, Inc.
 • What happened to quality control with toys?
 • Could we all just buy a bit less each year?
 • Coke and Pepsi: Liability from selling soda in schools?
 • Acupuncture for Children and Adults
 • I survived my day at the zoo with five 9yo girls!
 • Why comic books aren't so terrible for kids
 • Kids as philosophers, or finding meaning in skeeball
 • What would happen to your children if you died?
 • When did Halloween become so darn dangerous?
 • Why it's foolish to underestimate your children
 • One big reason we don't take our kids to the movie theater
 • Of cheating spouses and spanking parents
 • Research shows prolonged crying lowers IQ in babies
 • Why are ex-husbands sometimes such jerks?
 • Why we don't hit our kids
 • Is there anything cuter than baby talk?
 • Can children survive without corn syrup?
 • 5yo boy + pair of scissors = scary haircut!
 • Don't forget to tell your kids you love them!
 • "Amazing Amanda" crushes imagination with servos and RFID
 • Jury duty scam leads to identity theft
 • The lure of being single again?
 • A curious travel question: irons in hotel rooms?
 • EPA tacitly endorses testing pesticides on children?
 • What is Attachment Parenting?
 • Why can't we buy or sell a used carseat?
 • An Ethical Dilemma: Someone in your school is a registered sex offender?
 • FTC touts kids see fewer TV ads selling food, but the study is predictably bogus
 • I'm proud of my sister's beautiful art!
 • Avoiding work at home scams
 • Bras designed for girls growing up fast
 • Babies have personalities!
 • Those darn too long days of summer
 • Breast is still best, even if it's Dad's??
 • Travel tips for families this summer
 • How Computers Make Our Kids Stupid
 • Why parents associate summer with spending
 • Dave's secret trick for calming a hysterical child
 • Sometimes being right is far less important than just having fun
 • Warning: never let your baby play with the phone!
 • Parenting as talking to a brick wall?
 • Another of those "only a parent would laugh" moments
 • My journey to becoming an Attachment Parenting Dad
 • Should a man wear a wedding ring?
 • An AP parent on the benefit of no-media children
 • The perfect washer, or social engineering at its worst?
 • Take your Parents to School Day?
 • First week of weight gain sets lifelong weight patterns? I don't think so.
 • EPA cancels pesticide tests on Floridian babies
 • Standing your ground with discipline
 • Jack Welch says: forget it. You can't balance business and personal life
 • PBS introduces "PBS Kids Sprout" a new digital babysitter
 • Why are kid-friendly bathrooms so hard to find?
 • When does bedtime become other than a nightmare?
 • The Little Boy and the Monkeys: Children's picture book, needs pictures....
 • More schools are saying "no" to brands and logos
 • Why do so many men cheat on their spouses?
 • What's the toughest thing about being a father?
 • Breastfeeding and the Law
 • Waldorf Schools and the challenge of values-based organizations
 • We'll help you pick a great baby name!
 • How come parents never talk about parenting?
 • Another reason to be suspicious of parenting book authors
 • Scholastic succumbs to the siren song of corporate sponsorship of education
 • What would you suggest to this tired Mom?
 • What dreams have you dreamt today?
 • Vaccinations and the fear of getting sick
 • The challenge of being The Toy Police during the Holidays
 • Eventually, just about every kid has homework
 • The essence of good toys
 • Giving up on Privacy as part of Parenting
 • Five million reasons per year to discourage your kids from smoking
 • ... And on Halloween, the Candy Fairy Visited Our House!
 • A house full of sick children
 • More Dads are spending more time with their children
 • Are all children inveterate collectors?
 • How loud is too loud? How much should children be protected?
 • A Conference to Attend: Waldorf in the Home
 • Our long-term birth control option of choice: a vasectomy
 • What's one word that never shows up in parenting books?
 • Kindergarten Boarding School
 • Breastfed babies make happier adults?
 • Is Your Adoption Agency Legit?
 • Coming soon: Articles from "The Compleat Mother"
 • Father's Day and the Conundrum of Modern Economics
 • The real challenge of cosleeping: bed space!
 • Happy Mother's Day?
 • Update on bicycles and training wheels
 • Win a $25 Amazon Gift Certificate for adding a link!
 • When is a baby too young for a stroller?
 • A key attachment parenting virtue: patience
 • Taxes, Money and Debt. The big three?
 • A biological reason for teen laziness?
 • Is a toy without a microchip heresy?
 • Can't get your baby immobilized at night? Now there's a solution
 • Google likes Shining Light Books
 • Dealing with irrational fears
 • New Babies and Baby Names
 • Happy New Year!
 • Things really do unfold when it's time
 • Safe Surfing for Your Children
 • The Ebbs and Flows of Attachment Parenting
 • Sometimes you get a brief glimpse of what will be...
 • Funny Waldorf Lightbulb Jokes
 • Australian debate on breastfeeding
 • Scary bike accident, resilient children
 • A week of firsts...
 • Attachment Parenting Thought for the week
 • The Joy of Consistency
 • More on rhythms and summertime
 • The importance of schedules, even in the summer
 • "Eating your own dogfood"
 • Strategies pay off, sometimes
 • Chaos is sure to ensue!
 • When they're not ready to sleep...
 • Sleep Deprivation: The Essential Attachment Parenting Experience
 • Welcome Aboard!

Weblog Archives by Date
 • April 2008
 • March 2008
 • February 2008
 • January 2008
 • December 2007
 • November 2007
 • October 2007
 • September 2007
 • August 2007
 • July 2007
 • June 2007
 • May 2007
 • April 2007
 • March 2007
 • February 2007
 • January 2007
 • December 2006
 • November 2006
 • October 2006
 • September 2006
 • August 2006
 • July 2006
 • June 2006
 • May 2006
 • April 2006
 • March 2006
 • February 2006
 • January 2006
 • December 2005
 • November 2005
 • October 2005
 • September 2005
 • August 2005
 • July 2005
 • June 2005
 • May 2005
 • April 2005
 • March 2005
 • February 2005
 • January 2005
 • December 2004
 • November 2004
 • October 2004
 • August 2004
 • June 2004
 • May 2004
 • April 2004
 • February 2004
 • January 2004
 • December 2003
 • November 2003
 • September 2003
 • August 2003
 • July 2003
 • June 2003
 • May 2003